Back to the list (the right one ?): On Sonntag, 6. Februar 2005 21:12, Tony Houghton wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you wrote: > > > As I'm still waiting on TV access for my test with vdr-1.2.1, you may > > have a look at attached diff for a test with your G450. > > Perhaps I'll revert some of my formating changes. > > Unfortunately I'm only getting a blank white screen - with black bars > top and bottom, because the 16:9 option only works if I select it > manually at start-up, but that problem is lower priority ATM! VDR is > working correctly in the background, I can hear the sound and change > channels. When the OSD comes up I can see a white area overlapping the > border in the shape of the proper OSD. I remember seeing this white > screen phenomenon before, but I can't remember why or what I did to stop > it.
That previous diff failed the test on my vdr-1.2.1 G400 system too, got a flickering green image via s-video. But time goes on and this next one works with: a) vdr-1.3.18, DirectFB cvs from 2005-02-05, G550, composite out + monitor, P4 2.2G b) vdr-1.2.1, DirectFB 0.9.20, G400, s-video out, P3 Celeron 1.2G To be honest, on system "b" viewing is unacceptable. When OSD kicks in, video seems to be slow motion. Without OSD there is a jitter/flicker every now and then. CPU load at that time was about 50%. That has to be resolved too, next step(s). I'm wondering why these effects are not noticable on system "a". -- Stefan Lucke
dfb-field-parity-5th.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
