* James Gatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>
> Although this probably sounds like an odd thing - given that > DirectFB is supposed to be a fast lightweight layer between API > and hardware, I too would like to use DirectFB on X. The reason > (for me) is simply so that I can continue to develop my DirectFB > applications when all I have available is X (usually over a network). another good reason: It is a simple layer for accessing framebuffer devices. No matter what they are and where they are. All applications which just need rectangular screen can use it. This is what SDL was meant for, ages ago (at least it was my vision). Quite perfect for applications like mplayer. BTW: is there also something like dfb for audio ? cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cellphone: +49 174 7066481 --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- DSL ab 0 Euro. -- statische IP -- UUCP -- Hosting -- Webshops -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
