Ok So my 82865G card has a i830 chipset that is supported but unaccelerated whereas cards based on the i810 chipset are supported -and- accelerated. So the df_dok program would be significantly affected by the "--noaccel" option on a i810 based card. Just to make sure I understood, the kind of acceleration we are talking about here is 2D acceleration right? It has nothing to deal with 3D acceleration (which is directFBGL business)?
Gildas 2005/10/27, Denis Oliver Kropp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Quoting Gildas Bayard: > > Hello, > > > > I'm running the df_dok test program with and without acceleration > > (using -noaccel) and the results are quite the same in both runs > > I'm using linux fb driver for Intel 82865G and directFB has been > > compiled with intel support since I read: > > (*) DirectFB/Graphics: Intel 830/845G/852GM/855GM/865G 0.1 (Denis Oliver > > Kropp) > > > > Shouldn't I see a difference? > > The i830 driver does only provide a video overlay. But one could port over > the acceleration from the i810 driver or even make one driver out of them. > > -- > Best regards, > Denis Oliver Kropp > > .------------------------------------------. > | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | > | http://www.directfb.org/ | > "------------------------------------------" > _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
