On Sonntag 08 Oktober 2006 23:14, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote:
> Stefan Lucke schrieb:
> > On Sonntag 08 Oktober 2006 19:45, Nicolas Huillard wrote:
> >> DFB++ CVS 20061008 (today)
> >> * applied the GetFBOffsetDFB++.patch from libcle266mpegdec
> >> * this patch should make it into CVS, to keep in sync with DirectFB
> >> * there is nothing about field parity there, since Mark's patch was
> >> about the unichrome driver, not about DirectFB API (which DFB++ only
> >> deals with)
> > 
> > I think the DFB++ patch is still on Denis' radar, see:
> > http://mail.directfb.org/pipermail/directfb-dev/2006-October/002356.html
> > 
> > So I don't think we need to push him further.
> 
> I just applied your DFB++ patch. ++DFB also needs an update :)

Thank you very much, that was really fast.
Didn't I say "don't think we need to push" ?

> 
> Any help on bringing ++DFB and DFB++ up to date before making their
> 1.0.0-rc1 is appreciated :)
> 
> > The missing DFB++ part, is one reason not to publish a new softdevice 
> > release now.
> 
> I guess that depends on the DFB++ release, not just the commit I did 
> right now?

Oh, in terms of DFB++ it _was_ the commit. Now we can tell softdevice users:
just get the latest cvs versions (as they are in sync).

OT: Denis did you get a "hold for approval message", as you cc'd 
softdevice-devel and you're not on that list ? As softdevice list admin,
I did not yet get a notification on pending request to approve.

-- 
Stefan Lucke

_______________________________________________
directfb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users

Reply via email to