Sven Neumann schrieb:
>> If I replace the Unicode by the Glyph Index, it works:
>>
>> unsigned int character = 223;
>> surface->DrawGlyph(surface, character, 0, 0, (DFBSurfaceTextFlags)0);
>>
>> DFFA_NOCHARMAP is never used, and all encodings are UTF-8.
>> Why I can't use UTF-8 codes with DrawGlyph, what's wrong?
>>
>
> Nothing is wrong. DrawGlyph takes the Unicode character index, not an
> UTF-8 encoded string. That's the API. If you need something different,
> it shouldn't be difficult to write a small wrapper function.
>
>
Ok. Than the API-Doc is not clear for me
<API Doc>
Draw a single glyph specified by its character code at the specified
position with the given color following the specified flags.
/DrawGlyph (/
IDirectFBSurface
<http://www.directfb.org/docs/DirectFB_Reference/IDirectFBSurface.html>
*** *thiz,*
unsigned int
*character,*
int
*x,*
int
*y,*
DFBSurfaceTextFlags
<http://www.directfb.org/docs/DirectFB_Reference/types.html#DFBSurfaceTextFlags>
*flags*
/);/
If font was loaded with the DFFA_NOCHARMAP flag, index specifies the raw
glyph index in the font.
</API Doc>
This says for me: if the DFFA_NOCHARMAP flag is not given in the
DrawGlyph call, character is an UTF-8 char, if DFFA_NOCHARMAP flag is
given, character is an index.
Isn't it?
_______________________________________________
directfb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
