[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Hi all, > > Background > ---------- > > Thanks to the kind and enlightening info I got last time (thank you Ville and > Denis!), I managed to install, configure and run DFB on my system they way it > was designed to be done. > > I am now adding a new graphics driver to expose graphics acceleration > capabilities present on my platform, which are pretty complete and designed in > the spirit of DFB.
Nice :) Which platform is it? > My driver runs fine and thanks to the very readable code of DFB it is pretty > straight-forward to add support for most standard 2D acceleration features. Thanks, it seems you didn't hit the small amount of very old code that should be rewritten :) > The problem > ----------- > > I am not sure how to test my driver and hardware. Theoretically, I require a > tool which uses each accelerated feature (drawing/blitting function + state, > with random or pre-selected but spanning parameters) and then compares the > rendered surface against the software rasterizer's output. > > Is there such a tool for DFB? Apart from df_dok there's no feature test, especially no automatic verification and iteration through all possible combinations of formats, flags, caps etc. > If not, how were the other drivers tested? (the demo "df_drivertest" is far > from > complete, plus as far as I could see it only uses the driver, it does not > check > the output for correctness) Mainly using df_dok and other applications. A framework for automated tests has been planned, but never realized. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
