Hallo,
something has changed because now I got SIGNAL 11 error.
I run XDirectFB as user (after changing permission for /dev/fb/0, /dev/vc/0
and /dev/vc/1) and I've added the two entries no-graphics-vt and no-vt to my
/etc/directfbrc file.
This the output I got:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:bin$ ./X -fp /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc :0.0
XDirectFB / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your hardware is
newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ)
_XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6
_XSERVTransOpen: transport open failed for inet6/192.168.110.138:0
_XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to open listener for inet6
_XSERVTransmkdir: ERROR: euid != 0,directory /tmp/.X11-unix will not be
created.
_XSERVTransSocketUNIXCreateListener: mkdir(/tmp/.X11-unix) failed, errno = 2
_XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to create listener for local
XDirectFBClipboardProc - Could not open display, try: 1, sleeping: 4
=======================| DirectFB 1.0.0-rc4 |=======================
(c) 2001-2006 United Cultures of Earth - go for outer space!
(c) 2000-2004 Convergence (integrated media) GmbH
----------------------------------------------------------------
(*) DirectFB/Core: Single Application Core. (2007-02-15 15:27)
(!) Direct/Modules: Could not open module directory
`/opt/apps/DirectFB/lib/directfb-1.0-0/gfxdrivers'!
--> No such file or directory
(*) DirectFB/Graphics: Generic Software Rasterizer 0.6 (directfb.org)
(*) DirectFB/Core/WM: Default 0.3 (directfb.org)
(*) Direct/Thread: Running 'EventBufferFeed' (MESSAGING, 1204)...
davincifb_change_screen_mode: Updating to PAL mode
Screen 0 added: 720x576
(!) [ 1200: 0.000] --> Caught signal 11 (at 0x28, invalid address) <--
XDirectFBSignalHandler(11) called!
davincifb_change_screen_mode: Updating to LCD mode
Aborted
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My board has its video output set to LCD (why the strange "updating to PAL
mode"?) and I can only see a rapid blue flash on the screen before the
server crashes.
About monolithic Xorg, I think to spend some time to re-compile the modular
version...
Thanks for your help...
Bye,
Stae Painted
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:53:46PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hallo,
>> I'm trying to have XDirectFB running on my ARM Davinci board.
>> I compiled Xorg-6.8.2 patched with xc-directfb-xorg.diff taken from cvs.
>> Then I added the files and directory as suggested in the README file.
>> The cross-compilation process is OK but I can't run the executable server
>> with success.
>> This is my output after typing startx:
>> ----------------------------------------
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:bin# ./startx &
>> [1] 949
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:bin#
>> XDirectFB / X Window System
>> (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
>> If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your hardware is
>> newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
>> reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ)
>> _XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6
>> _XSERVTransOpen: transport open failed for inet6/192.168.110.135:0
>> _XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to open listener for inet6
>> _XSERVTransmkdir: ERROR: euid != 0,directory /tmp/.X11-unix will not be
>> created.
>> _XSERVTransSocketUNIXCreateListener: mkdir(/tmp/.X11-unix) failed, errno
>> = 2
>> _XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to create listener for
>> local
>
> These errors are not related to DirectFB. Did the 6.8.2 release server
> require root privilieges? I remeber running XDirectFB as root at one
> point but I don't really remember why I did that. I'm currently running
> the xorg-server-1.1.1 based thing as a regular user. In any case I would
> recommend using the modular version because AFAIK the monolithic version
> is completely abandoned by the developers.
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/
>
> _______________________________________________
> directfb-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/XDirectFB-and-ARM-tf3234212.html#a9006554
Sent from the DirectFB Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
directfb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
