On Friday 02 March 2007 22:07, Leo Márquez wrote: > Hi Stefan and Mark and thanks for your answer, > > Stefan Lucke escribió: > > >The only things which I can think of is > >- permissions (as you mentioned), > > > > > I use root user for all. > > >- a missing ldconfig after make install > > > > > I have executed ldconfig now and I get: > > ldconfig: /usr/lib/libfusion-0.9.so.26 is not a symbolic link > > ldconfig: /usr/lib/libdirectfb-0.9.so.26 is not a symbolic link > > ldconfig: /usr/lib/libdirect-0.9.so.26 is not a symbolic link > > ldconfig: /usr/lib/libpostproc.so.51 is not a symbolic link > > Are normal these messages?
If these a regular files, you might run into troubles, as you have different versions of DirectFB installed, in different locations /usr/lib vs. /usr/local/lib > > >- the installation target directory is not in the search path of the dynamic > >loader. > >but in last case I would expect different error messages. > > > >Leo could your search for libdirectfb_unichrome.so in your /usr/local folder > >? > >My DirectFB version here is a bit older, and I get it in: > >jarada vdr-1.4.0.jarada # cd /usr/local/ > >jarada local # find . -name libdirectfb_unichrome.so > >./lib/directfb-0.9.25/gfxdrivers/libdirectfb_unichrome.so > >./lib/directfb-0.9.26/gfxdrivers/libdirectfb_unichrome.so > I have do it and I get: > > dori:/usr/src/linux-viafb/linux/drivers/video/cle266# cd /usr/local > dori:/usr/local# find . -name libdirectfb_unichrome.so > ./lib/directfb-0.9.26/gfxdrivers/libdirectfb_unichrome.so > ./lib/directfb-1.0-0/gfxdrivers/libdirectfb_unichrome.so So now it depends on the search order of the dynamic loader, defined in /etc/ld.so.conf. Is /usr/local/lib specified before /usr/lib ? Another way could be to remove the directfb installation shipped with your distribution, so that libs + include files will be removed. -- Stefan Lucke _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
