Denis Oliver Kropp wrote:
> Mickael Istria wrote:
>> /* Devices using KEYS */
>> if (num_keys > 0 || num_ext_keys > 0)
>> {
>> info->desc.caps |= DICAPS_KEYS;
>> /* a keyboard */
>> if (num_keys > 20) /* or any other condition that defines a keyboard */
>> info->desc.type |= DIDTF_KEYBOARD;
>> else if (num_ext_keys > 0) /* or any other condition that defines a
>> remote */
>> info->desc.type |= DIDTF_REMOTE;
>> else if ( /* eg matches numbers from 0 to 9 */) /* or any other
>> condition that defines a keypad */
>> info->desc.type |= DIDTF_KEYPAD; // to define
>> else
>> info->desc.type |= DIDTF_UNKNOWN; // to define
>> }
>>
>> Do you think it would be a solution?
>
> Yes. But maybe raising the minimum number of ext keys would make
> front panels keypads instead of remotes.
Actually, "remote" should be an attribute. There could be remote
keyboards as well. It also means that a "remote control" is classified
as a remote keypad.
But how to detect whether something is remote?
--
Best regards,
Denis Oliver Kropp
.------------------------------------------.
| DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics |
| http://www.directfb.org/ |
"------------------------------------------"
_______________________________________________
directfb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
