Craig Matsuura wrote: > 1) There is not support for BGR24 (TI version which is BGR24)
If there's no other way, e.g. a color matrix where we could swap B and R (0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0) we would need a new pixelformat or a define for the order. > 2) Trying to use the davinci support in directfb does not work due to missing > ioctl calls. http://www.directfb.org/downloads/davincifb_2.6.10.tar.bz2 > Do you have a patch for the davincifb.c to add the ioctl calls? How about > support for BGR24? > > I really think the missing ioctl calls are the biggest issue, as if this > worked I could persue 1280x720 mode. As for the BGR24, I would like to know > what I can change in directfb to support this strange format in directfb. Which Davinci are you using. I have a 6446 and don't think it supports 1280x720. > NOTE: Keep in mind the BGR24 mode is when I use /dev/fb1 (fbdev support in > directfb), not the direct support claimed to be working in directfb. The native driver uses OSD0+OSD1 and VID1. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list directfb-users@directfb.org http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
