I know from experience that linking against a different DirectFB version is bad. You should however be ok if the versions are binary compatible. This is the fourth version digit you may see at some places. The master - slave communication is done via shared memory structures and fusion, so basically these structures should remain unaltered.
Libc I don't know.. George Tsalikis wrote: > What happens if a slave process is linked against a different DirectFB > version, or one that is linked against another libc? > > _______________________________________________ > directfb-users mailing list > directfb-users@directfb.org > http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users > > -- .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list directfb-users@directfb.org http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
