Hi all,
I am working on STB7100 reference board and using STLinux2.2. The
precompiled driver does not seem to be supporting hardware acceleration. I
was trying to test the Enlightenment Foundation Libraries on it but
according to the benchmark results i got by using expedite(Expedite is the
benchmark program of Evas),shows me that there is no difference between
using hardware on and software on. Whenever i changed the value at the
directfbrc to no-software, i started to get warning messages.
#df_particle
(!!!) *** WARNING [Ignoring draw (1) to RGB16, flags 0x00000001] ***
[generic.c:6377 in gAcquire()]
(!!!) *** WARNING [Ignoring draw (1) to RGB16, flags 0x00000001] ***
[generic.c:6377 in gAcquire()]
(!!!) *** WARNING [Ignoring draw (1) to RGB16, flags 0x00000001] ***
[generic.c:6377 in gAcquire()]
and benchmark never starts.
Below is the df_dok results:
Anti-aliased Text 3.021 secs ( 32.174
KChars/sec)
Anti-aliased Text (blend) 3.378 secs ( 6.394
KChars/sec)
Fill Rectangle 3.087 secs ( 44.582
MPixel/sec)
Fill Rectangle (blend) 5.338 secs ( 1.227
MPixel/sec)
Fill Rectangles [10] 4.241 secs ( 46.358
MPixel/sec)
Fill Rectangles [10] (blend) 53.945 secs ( 1.214
MPixel/sec)
Fill Triangles 3.006 secs ( 30.522
MPixel/sec)
Fill Triangles (blend) 5.395 secs ( 1.214
MPixel/sec)
Draw Rectangle 3.019 secs ( 3.643
KRects/sec)
Draw Rectangle (blend) 3.076 secs ( 0.585
KRects/sec)
Draw Lines [10] 3.029 secs ( 11.224
KLines/sec)
Draw Lines [10] (blend) 3.131 secs ( 2.555
KLines/sec)
Fill Spans 3.123 secs ( 37.772
MPixel/sec)
Fill Spans (blend) 5.452 secs ( 1.202
MPixel/sec)
Blit 3.267 secs ( 20.059
MPixel/sec)
Blit colorkeyed 3.040 secs ( 12.934
MPixel/sec)
Blit destination colorkeyed 3.521 secs ( 3.722
MPixel/sec)
Blit with format conversion 4.516 secs ( 2.902
MPixel/sec)
Blit with colorizing 3.764 secs ( 1.741
MPixel/sec)
Blit from 32bit (blend) 3.470 secs ( 1.888
MPixel/sec)
Blit from 32bit (blend) with colorizing 8.652 secs ( 0.757
MPixel/sec)
Stretch Blit 5.659 secs ( 19.902
MPixel/sec)
Stretch Blit colorkeyed 8.138 secs ( 13.839
MPixel/sec)
When i made a test with df_particle the result was not as expected (after
writing "hardware" to directfbrc file instead of "no-software"), it was slow
and not smooth.
df_particle - a moving fountain consisting of alphablended rectangles,
nice and fast if hardware accelerated
I also read the thread here:
http://www.nabble.com/Performance-issue-with-STi7109-td14580428.html
It is written that "The ST people told us that the official stapi 2.2
framebuffer driver
doesn't support *DirectFB*... quite disappointing... ".
Anybody had experience with the same problem with me? Is the STLinux2.2
built in driver really not supporting hardware acceleration and what should
be done for that? I thought cross compiling a never version but when i tried
a regular DirectFB 1.2.7 source i didn't see any gfx driver related with
SThardware.
Thanx.
--
Oğuz Yarımtepe
www.loopbacking.info
_______________________________________________
directfb-users mailing list
directfb-users@directfb.org
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
