Great - I will to subscribe to their mailing list and try to get their
attention on this

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Mir Tanvir Hossain <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I am working part time on a project to use JCS and DirectMemory together. I
> have not made much progress yet. I'd be happy to contribute my time on
> integrating these projects together.
>
> -Mir
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Jcs recently had a lot of activities see
> >
> >
> http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?view=resultlist&path=%2Fcommons%2Fproper%2Fjcs&plotsort=%24plotsort
> >
> > no release sure but some dev.
> >
> > 2011/11/8 Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]>:
> > > I think the problem is the overall lack of activity in JCS. Let's try
> to
> > > ping them in the ml but I also would like to think about an Avro
> > > distribution mechanism. The basics are very simple - sending updates to
> > the
> > > pointerslist to every partecipating node and asking (from node to node)
> > for
> > > a specific bytearray. Any volounteer for this?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> 2011/11/8 Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]>:
> > >> > Do someone knows them?
> > >> Not personnally :-)
> > >> BTW Simone is a very active commons dev.
> > >> IMHO Maybe you can simply send an email to commons-dev@ ?
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> +1 on the join idea.
> > >> >> Just a matter of asking the jcs guy.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2011/11/8 Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]>:
> > >> >> > I like the idea of joining forces with JCS, also, as far as I
> know,
> > >> since
> > >> >> > it's Apache licensed we could eventually take that same code and
> > port
> > >> it
> > >> >> in
> > >> >> > DM, but obviously I think we should try to avoid it.
> > >> >> > Regarding the distributed cache I know Hadoop offers one so that
> > could
> > >> >> also
> > >> >> > be an option for an off-heap plugin.
> > >> >> > However I personally would be happy also to use NIO and have our
> > own
> > >> way
> > >> >> of
> > >> >> > distributing cache.
> > >> >> > Just some thoughts.
> > >> >> > Regards,
> > >> >> > Tommaso
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > 2011/11/8 Mir Tanvir Hossain <[email protected]>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> I think it would be a great idea to merge these project to
> create
> > a
> > >> >> >> complete caching solution. JCS seems to have an excellent disk
> > >> caching
> > >> >> >> support as well. So, the combined project could be a fantastic
> > >> caching
> > >> >> >> solution.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> -Mir
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi <
> > >> >> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> > This is of course an interesting option - well, we could also
> > >> leverage
> > >> >> >> > indexed disk cache as L3 - and steal indexing and recycling
> > >> >> techniques.
> > >> >> >> > Merging efforts with JCS could bring to the most complete java
> > >> cache
> > >> >> >> > solution in the OS world. I don't have any idea about
> > performance
> > >> of
> > >> >> JCS
> > >> >> >> > and its lateral cache, but it's probably a bit outdated and
> > could
> > >> >> benefit
> > >> >> >> > from a technology refresh (NIO, fast serialization - see
> Apache
> > >> Avro
> > >> >> as
> > >> >> >> an
> > >> >> >> > example)
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Mir Tanvir Hossain <
> > >> >> >> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > > JCS already has distributed caching option. So, instead of
> > >> >> >> > re-implementing
> > >> >> >> > > the distributed cache, we can integrate tightly with JCS,
> and
> > >> become
> > >> >> >> its
> > >> >> >> > > off-heap plugin. So, JCS could be the L1 cache, and
> > DirectMemory
> > >> >> could
> > >> >> >> be
> > >> >> >> > > the L2 cache. Just an idea.
> > >> >> >> > >
> > >> >> >> > > -Mir
> > >> >> >> > >
> > >> >> >> > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Ioannis Canellos <
> > >> >> [email protected]>
> > >> >> >> > > wrote:
> > >> >> >> > >
> > >> >> >> > > > I was looking at the jira issues and DIRECTMEMORY-13 -
> Make
> > >> some
> > >> >> >> > > > investigation about going
> > >> >> >> > > > distributed<
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRECTMEMORY-13
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > > > caught
> > >> >> >> > > > my attention.
> > >> >> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> > > > I've read about some of the initial thoughts about reusing
> > >> >> features
> > >> >> >> of
> > >> >> >> > > > existing Caches (Hazelcast or Terracotta) but I don't like
> > this
> > >> >> idea
> > >> >> >> so
> > >> >> >> > > > much.
> > >> >> >> > > > We could reuse some of the ides that existing projects
> use,
> > >> but I
> > >> >> >> think
> > >> >> >> > > > that we should either build it on our own, or use a
> solution
> > >> not
> > >> >> >> > coupled
> > >> >> >> > > to
> > >> >> >> > > > an existing cache.
> > >> >> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> > > > So what are your thought about making direct memory
> > >> distributed?
> > >> >> >> > > > Any thoughts about the consistency model, discovery etc?
> > >> >> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> > > > --
> > >> >> >> > > > *Ioannis Canellos*
> > >> >> >> > > > *
> > >> >> >> > > > FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
> > >> >> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> > > > **
> > >> >> >> > > > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> > >> >> >> > > > **
> > >> >> >> > > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> > >> >> >> > > > Apache Camel <http://camel.apache.org/> Committer
> > >> >> >> > > > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/>
> >  Committer
> > >> >> >> > > > Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer
> > >> >> >> > > > Apache DirectMemory <
> > http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/
> > >> >
> > >> >> >> > > Committer
> > >> >> >> > > > *
> > >> >> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> Olivier Lamy
> > >> >> Talend : http://talend.com
> > >> >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Olivier Lamy
> > >> Talend : http://talend.com
> > >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Olivier Lamy
> > Talend : http://talend.com
> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >
>

Reply via email to