+1 Il giorno 15/feb/2012 09:45, "Maurizio Cucchiara" <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> Sounds good :) > > Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara > G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 > Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara > > Maurizio Cucchiara > > > > On 14 February 2012 23:03, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > sorry for bugging but I have to take advantage the pet is sleeping, > > before she wakes up and I have to get out :P > > > > I see that the purpose of some classes is having fluent APIs - which I > > *adore* - anyway in the current codebase there are some points of > > improvements... > > > > For example: {{Every.seconds(10)}} is not really "sexy", I use to > > import static methods to have a functional-alike look in my Java code, > > so I propose modifying some APIs to have: > > > > +--------+ > > import static Every.every; > > ... > > every( 10 ).seconds(); > > +--------+ > > > > that looks more fluent "every then seconds" instead of "every seconds > 10"... > > > > WDYT? It is a trivial improvement but in my short experience sexy APIs > > attract people... :P > > > > TIA, > > -Simo > > > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > > http://www.99soft.org/ >
