+1

Jeff


On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hooray for Olivier!
>
> Thanks,
>   R
> Il giorno 15/giu/2012 22:36, "Tim Williams" <[email protected]> ha
> scritto:
>
> > That's great news Olivier!
> >
> > --tim
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > If no other volunteer, I will work on releasing a 0.1 early next week.
> > > IHMO this can be considered as a released "technology preview" (even
> > > if apis change later).
> > >
> > > 2012/6/15 Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]>:
> > >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Jeff MAURY <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>> I think there are a number of items to work before we do a release.
> > >>> I'm not very familiar of Apache way of release but I have the feeling
> > that
> > >>
> > >> releasing is not only putting software "to the public", it is also
> > >> "learning how to release" (at least in the incubator). Nobody expects
> > >> a perfect release with a 1.0 imho. "Release often, early".
> > >>
> > >>> if we do a release now, we will break compatibility with next
> release.
> > >>> Why not an Alpha of Beta or continue on a 0.0.x ?
> > >>
> > >> Nothing speaks against that :-)
> > >> 0.0.1 sounds pretty alpha to me, i would skip the term "alpha" and
> > >> just make "0.0.1". One can state on the homepage that the API is
> > >> matter of change.
> > >>
> > >> I have only limited time, but I am willing to look at your artifacts
> > >> and help pointing you to the right docs with the release. In addition
> > >> I think one of the new arrived people should release. As mentioned, it
> > >> is learning, and if always the old grumpys release, the new blood does
> > >> not gain experience. :-)
> > >>
> > >> Cheers
> > >> Christian
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> Jeff
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi <
> > >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I am in shortage of spare time since a while and it will be even
> > worse for
> > >>>> the next few months. And also I've never managed an Apache release.
> I
> > think
> > >>>> that this is going to take a bit longer than expected.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Ciao,
> > >>>>    R
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Tommaso Teofili
> > >>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> > Big +1 for a release, personally I'm busy with (trying to) release
> > Amber
> > >>>> at
> > >>>> > the moment, if anyone can jump in it'd be perfect otherwise I'll
> > try to
> > >>>> do
> > >>>> > it once Amber gets a release.
> > >>>> > Tommaso
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > 2012/6/15 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > > Hi Tim!!!
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > agreed, a release is "needed", we've been around for a long
> time -
> > >>>> > > time for people to know more from us! :P
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > I'll contribute on double check the RC, unfortunately I've been
> > too
> > >>>> > > much busy in the last months (and still am) so cannot contribute
> > as
> > >>>> > > RM.
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > All the best,
> > >>>> > > -Simo
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> > >>>> > > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> > >>>> > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> > >>>> > > http://www.99soft.org/
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Tim Williams <
> > [email protected]>
> > >>>> > > wrote:
> > >>>> > > > Gents,
> > >>>> > > > Can you work out a release soon? You develop and interact
> > according
> > >>>> to
> > >>>> > > > the apache way and yet you're still in incubation because
> > you've not
> > >>>> > > > had a formal release.  I'm wondering if one of the old timers
> > around
> > >>>> > > > here can be the RM and just get it done so that we can
> graduate
> > >>>> > > > already? Call it 0.1 if needbe:)
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > Thanks,
> > >>>> > > > --tim
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Jeff MAURY
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by
> actually
> > >>> working and scaling.
> > >>>  - Bjarne Stroustrup
> > >>>
> > >>> http://www.jeffmaury.com
> > >>> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
> > >>> http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> http://www.grobmeier.de
> > >> https://www.timeandbill.de
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Olivier Lamy
> > > Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >
>



-- 
Jeff MAURY


"Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually
working and scaling.
 - Bjarne Stroustrup

http://www.jeffmaury.com
http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury

Reply via email to