Kelsey Cummings wrote:
I just wanted to check to see if anyone using dirvish had already hacked it to allow specification of multiple trees in a single config yet. The method outlined in the url below is not so much and would be a real issue to maintain over the number of systems that we plan on backing up with dirvish. http://www.dirvish.org/pipermail/dirvish/2006-April/000680.html
You know... I can't for the LIFE of me figure out or make myself understand WHY someone would want to do that. I didn't understanding back in 2006..and I don't understand now. I guess I've never been in a situation that would require me to think of using dirvish in that respect.

What I *CAN* understand is grouping related vaults. Rather than fight the includes and excludes, why not just give each of the "trees" its own vault, then group the vaults together in a bank. There is no hard and fast rule that says you can't have multiple banks on the same physical device.

Let's say that you start with this configuration:
*Device /dev/usbdrive1 is mounted onto mountpoint /banks/backupdrive1 and has vaults in there named 'server-root', 'server-usr', 'server-home', and 'server-var'.

*Your /etc/dirvish/master.conf lists your BANK as /banks/backupdrive1

What you "COULD" do is to re-arrange your directory structure on /banks/backupdrive1 and add an extra layer.

*Make a directory called /banks/backupdrive1/mainserver and move all of your existing vaults into './mainserver'
*edit your master.conf file and modify the path for the bank
*Make a NEW directory called /banks/backupdrive1/etcgroupings and create vaults in './groupings' named...
 server-etc1, server-etc3, ..et al...
*edit your master.conf file to ADD the new bank location.


But then...maybe I'm totally lost...which I think I am.  Good luck though.

--
Richard

_______________________________________________
Dirvish mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish

Reply via email to