Paul Slootman wrote: > On Wed 15 Aug 2012, Dave Howorth wrote: >> The important take-home message is that the numerical IDs are what >> count. The names are just 'sugar' for humans and don't really mean anything. > > I feel compelled to mention here that this is valid in dirvish context, > as dirvish supplies rsync with the --numeric-ids option; rsync's default > is to try to map names on the source and destination.
Wow, I never even realized that. Mostly because all my machines share uids. Seems like a broken rsync default, if you ask me, but then what do I know? :) Cheers, Dave _______________________________________________ Dirvish mailing list [email protected] http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish
