Paul Slootman wrote: > I generally use ext4, as it performs well and predictably.
Again, FWIW, I used to use reiser, which was good, and then tried ext4 but it was much too slow, after which I moved to XFS and then ZFS. I'm quite prepared to accept that ext4 is perfectly fine on other workloads. I think the moral is that you need to benchmark your own workload at the time. Cheers, Dave _______________________________________________ Dirvish mailing list Dirvish@dirvish.org http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish
