On 2016-03-07 12:26, H Oli wrote:
> ... as previous notes... if dest. is not unix/linux-like system,wold be
> problems of hardlinks
> 2016.03.07. 13:12 ezt írta ("Dave Howorth" <dhowo...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk>):Just to be clear, I was referring to different Linux filesystems types, though what I wrote clearly applies to other types of system a fortiori. Cheers, Dave >> On 2016-03-07 11:52, John Lewis wrote: >>> Weird... >>> >>> The result using -H is total size on remote server is 2GB while local is >>> only 1.5GB. >> >> Filesystem type can make a difference. >> >> Also, have you checked a sample of the hardlinks to make sure that they >> do actually match on the local and remote now? >> >> Cheers, Dave >> _______________________________________________ >> Dirvish mailing list >> Dirvish@dirvish.org >> http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dirvish mailing list > Dirvish@dirvish.org > http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish > _______________________________________________ Dirvish mailing list Dirvish@dirvish.org http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish
