Thanks Kevin! All sounds good to me. Dan
On 15 January 2016 at 15:15, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > As we prepare to bring our new Discovery ops person on board in a couple > weeks, we have been talking about how to integrate Guillaume's workflow > into our process. The following strawdog proposals are based on > conversations that involved me, Dan, Guillaume, and others. > > 1. Meetings > > We propose having Guillaume attend the search team standups for now, since > 90+% of his initial work will relate to search. He would probably not any > of the sprint planning or backlog grooming meetings. It's not clear whether > we should have a weekly Ops planning meeting, which would resemble the > Analysis planning meetings we already have. > > 2. Phabricator > > We would create a Discovery-ops-sprint project/board, which will > represent the work of the Discovery ops team. This aligns with how we have > handled the Maps and WDQS sub-teams, which are also very small teams. > > 3. Learn and iterate > > Whatever we end up trying as a starting point, we'll inspect and adapt it > as we go. > > > Any questions, comments, concerns, or questions? > > > Kevin Smith > Agile Coach, Wikimedia Foundation > > > _______________________________________________ > discovery mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery > > -- Dan Garry Lead Product Manager, Discovery Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ discovery mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery
