On Billinghurst's point I would really love to see the changes that have been successful tested on (particularly) Wikisource, where I imagine that the dropdown metadata could be tremendously valuable.
On 25 January 2016 at 07:42, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> wrote: > I really like this idea but I'd recommend we use it for more > qualitative than quantitative feedback, unless we have a solid plan to > surface the labs page to a good sample of users. > > On 23 January 2016 at 00:07, Dan Garry <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 22 January 2016 at 20:43, Julien Girault <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Thank you for jumping on this, though the aim of this thread was to have a >>> discussion and move forward (with this kind of technical operations) only >>> once we get a common feeling that this is a good idea and we figured out the >>> concerns that people may have. >>> >>> Nonetheless, I'm sure removing this is just as easy as setting it up, so I >>> don't see any harm for now. >> >> >> Yeah, these things can be pulled down and replaced with something else with >> just a few console commands, so I don't think there's any problems here >> either. :-) >> >> Dan >> >> -- >> Dan Garry >> Lead Product Manager, Discovery >> Wikimedia Foundation >> >> _______________________________________________ >> discovery mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery >> > > > > -- > Oliver Keyes > Count Logula > Wikimedia Foundation -- Oliver Keyes Count Logula Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ discovery mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery
