Than Paul,
Here's what I fell when comparing (feedback from a non-expert):
(oops the site went down when I was browsing)

Overall I really like the new contrasts.
On the other hand green regions seem too dark to me mostly because I have
the impression that rivers are less visible now (maybe blue should be
darker as well?)

Thanks!

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> I was comparing the old and new styles, and at first I thought the new was
> on the left, and old on the right. Now I see they are the other way around.
> Would it be easy to label each panel, to avoid confusion?
>
> Some observations, based on looking at downtown Seattle:
>
> Most of the piers along the waterfront were too faint before, but look
> good now.
>
> 2nd and 4th aves weren't highlighted as major streets before, but now they
> are. But 1st isn't. Google highlights 1st, 2nd, and 4th. I'm not sure what
> is most accurate.
>
> Northeast of Stewart St, running above the middle of 5th Avenue is a
> monorail, and the track supports divide the road. Google shows all that
> pretty well. Neither our old or new styles show the track, or the division,
> clearly. I can just barely see the track itself in the new style, if I know
> to look for it.
>
> The SR 99 tunnel is never shown any more. In the old style, at zoom 15, it
> was clearly labeled, but the tunnel itself was barely visible. At 16, it
> was both visible and well-labeled.
>
> At the south end of downtown, the Yesler Terrace neighborhood label is
> getting cut off at "YE" at 14 and above. International District/Chinatown
> disappears at 14, but is visible at 13 and 15.
>
> I miss having more neighborhood labels, like Lower Queen Anne (just
> northwest of downtown), which was shown on the old style. On Mercer Island
> (in the lake, east of Seattle), there used to be several neighborhoods
> shown, but now there are none.
>
> I like the new light rail/trolley/bus station icons. But I miss having bus
> stops at 16. But I guess it depends on what the map is going to be used
> for. Also, I'll confess that I'm so accustomed to google's blue bus stops
> that seeing them in dark gray is a big jarring for me.
>
>
> If you want me to create phab tasks for any of those, let me know
> off-list.
>
>
>
> Kevin Smith
> Agile Coach, Wikimedia Foundation
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> As part of https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T153282 a new style for
>> Wikimedia maps is being developed, and I've loaded up the whole planet
>> on one of my test servers as a test and demo.
>>
>> The demo is available at http://legolas.paulnorman.ca:6789/, and through
>> "Compare" on the right-hand side of the interface you can compare it
>> with the current Wikimedia style, OpenStreetMap Carto, and lots of
>> others. Some other things to be aware of when comparing are:
>>
>> - The map is displayed with Kosmtik, a design tool with minimal caching,
>>   and it might be restarted while I'm working on it
>>
>> - Even though the server is faster than production, it may appear slower
>>   because it doesn't have everything cached
>>
>> - The OSM data on the server is normally within a day of the latest data
>>
>> Some of the more noticeable style changes are
>>
>> - Road colours are different, helping view the overall layout of the
>>   city
>>
>> - There are fewer cases of subtly different shades of green.
>>
>> - Bridges and multi-level road constructions are now handled properly,
>>   which should make some areas easier to figure out
>>
>> I am particularly interested in feedback on
>>
>> - the overall colour darkness and intensity,
>>
>> - which of city, region, and country labels are most important:
>>   https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T163503
>>
>> Feedback is welcome, either through email, phab tickets, or by IRC in
>> #wikimedia-interactive on freenode.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discovery mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discovery mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery
>
>
_______________________________________________
discovery mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery

Reply via email to