I just looked at the reports—and specifically at the suggestions it makes on code I'm familiar with—and while I'm not sure all of the issues warrant fixing, a lot of them are obviously valid improvements. It's also good to have code coverage reports for our plugins.
So, it probably had the effect you desired, in that I now want to write some more tests. Trey Jones Sr. Software Engineer, Search Platform Wikimedia Foundation On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:37 AM Guillaume Lederrey <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello! > > I took some time to upload a first analysis of our Java based projects > to SonarCloud [1]. This is just experimentation at this point, but > there are a few interesting findings that should be corrected. > > What's missing: > * run the analysis regularly, so that we can see trends > * host it on our own infrastructure instead of depending on SonarCloud > * some discussion on whether we agree with the metrics / issues > * lot more > > Have fun! > > Guillaume > > > [1] https://sonarcloud.io/organizations/wmftest/projects > > -- > Guillaume Lederrey > Operations Engineer, Search Platform > Wikimedia Foundation > UTC+2 / CEST > > _______________________________________________ > Discovery mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery >
_______________________________________________ Discovery mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery
