If I set one port "mod-port no-flood",then the seted port itself can not send
ARP broadcast.this leads to the port can not communicate to others.
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "discuss-request";<[email protected]>;
Date: Fri, Oct 25, 2013 00:49 AM
To: "discuss"<[email protected]>;
Subject: discuss Digest, Vol 52, Issue 96
Send discuss mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. 802.1Q Conformance (Vivek Saxena)
2. how to use ovs to controll one port's forward ( ??? )
3. Error with the number of flows reported by OVS (Sahil4 S)
4. Re: how to use ovs to controll one port's forward (Alex Wang)
5. Re: Error with the number of flows reported by OVS (Ben Pfaff)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 05:07:06 -0400
From: Vivek Saxena <[email protected]>
Subject: [ovs-discuss] 802.1Q Conformance
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<CAJaQUEEpwcycK7v5Gmcn517SP+kw2XJarNCE2SSZ=8czzoc...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
Has OVS been tested by anyone for conformance with 802.1Q ?
Please tell me how can I rate it on 802.1Q compliance.
Thanks,
Vivek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131024/cc05a3d5/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:10:59 +0800
From: " ??? " <[email protected]>
Subject: [ovs-discuss] how to use ovs to controll one port's forward
To: " discuss " <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb18030"
Hi,guys.
I have one quesstion.
Recently,I need this requirement. when ovs's one port receive broadcast
packet(such as ARP broadcast),it does not forward the broadcast to other ports
which beyond to one bridge.
Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131024/747636ef/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:07:06 +0530
From: Sahil4 S <[email protected]>
Subject: [ovs-discuss] Error with the number of flows reported by OVS
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<ofe7e72372.b003f0ce-on65257c0e.00504d32-65257c0e.00504...@tcs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi All,
I am working with the OVS version - 2.0.9 and I am facing the following issue:
I issues a FLOW_MOD command to delete all the flows and then verified with the
following command on the switch side:
abc@abc-ThinkCentre-M91P:~/oftest$ sudo ovs-ofctl dump-flows br0
NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4):
But, If I see the number of tables it shows the number of active flows in the
table 0 as 7. Why is this discrepency?
Following is the output of the same:
abc@abc-ThinkCentre-M91P:~/oftest$ sudo ovs-ofctl dump-tables br0
OFPST_TABLE reply (xid=0x2): 254 tables
? 0: classifier: wild=0x3fffff, max=1000000, active=7
?????????????? lookup=100, matched=20
? 1: table1? : wild=0x3fffff, max=1000000, active=0
?????????????? lookup=0, matched=0
? 2: table2? : wild=0x3fffff, max=1000000, active=0
?????????????? lookup=0, matched=0
? 3: table3? : wild=0x3fffff, max=1000000, active=0
?????????????? lookup=0, matched=0
? 4: table4? : wild=0x3fffff, max=1000000, active=0
?????????????? lookup=0, matched=0
? 5: table5? : wild=0x3fffff, max=1000000, active=0
?????????????? lookup=0, matched=0
........253 tables with 0 active flows.
Due to this when I for the stats, stats_reply message send me the no of active
flows as 7 whereas I am expecting the number of flows to be 0 resulting in the
failure of my test case.
My test cases which were passing earlier on version 1.4.0 are now failing on
the new version. Is this the issue with the OVS code or I am missing something.
Please guide.
Thanks and Regards
?
Sahil Shah
IT Analyst
Tata Consultancy Services
Cell:- 09873552128
Mailto: [email protected]
=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
review, distribution, printing or copying of the
information contained in this e-mail message
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error,
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
immediately and permanently delete the message
and any attachments. Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131024/7301ff43/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:27:37 -0700
From: Alex Wang <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] how to use ovs to controll one port's
forward
To: ??? <[email protected]>
Cc: discuss <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<CAArS4XW_=h9sht7h_geszdevaln+azumswsn1s+uimgnyej...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hey Qi,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:10 AM, ??? <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,guys.
> I have one quesstion.
> Recently,I need this requirement. when ovs's one port receive
> broadcast packet(such as ARP broadcast),it does not forward the broadcast
> to other ports which beyond to one bridge.
You can use "mod-port no-flood" to achieve it.
Thanks,
Alex Wang,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131024/98012a6a/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:49:18 -0700
From: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Error with the number of flows reported by
OVS
To: Sahil4 S <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 08:07:06PM +0530, Sahil4 S wrote:
> I am working with the OVS version - 2.0.9 and I am facing the following issue:
>
> I issues a FLOW_MOD command to delete all the flows and then verified with
> the following command on the switch side:
>
> abc@abc-ThinkCentre-M91P:~/oftest$ sudo ovs-ofctl dump-flows br0
> NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4):
>
> But, If I see the number of tables it shows the number of active flows
> in the table 0 as 7. Why is this discrepency?
You probably have a controller configured in in-band mode. In-band mode
uses a number of "hidden" flows.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
End of discuss Digest, Vol 52, Issue 96
***************************************
._______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
