Hi Jesse, Thanks for the mail.
If my understanding is not wrong, if both bridges have similar flows then the one with higher priority takes precedence. I have a question, if we have multiple bridges in same node(like a mininet case) where each bridge is realized like a host and if we create tunnels between those bridges using alias ip addresses of the node as respective remote_ip addresses, I could ping between namespaces attached to those bridges. I am unable to understand how the remote_ip is mapped to a particular bridge since all are in same node. Thanks Eswar On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Jesse Gross <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, ESWAR RAO <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Jesse, > > > > Thanks for the response. > > I was able to broadcast the traffic based on flow based tunneling. > > > > I have 2 bridges (br-int and br-tun) in same node connected by a > patch-port. > > br-int is in learning mode and br-tun has a tunnel port created based on > > flow based tunneling. > > The physical "eth" interface is not added to any bridge. > > > > Just wanted to know for the incoming traffic to the node, which bridge > flow > > rules are accounted?? > > Whatever flow match the traffic as received, which is not necessarily > the one that was used for transmit. >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
