On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:29 AM, David Evans <[email protected]> wrote:
> BTW- it works fine when b0 bridge type is NOT netdev and port is not
> accessed via DPDK.
> Something in the userspace data path may be broken?
>

Can you try same test with netdev datapath and userspace tunneling?

> On 2/12/15, 9:16 AM, "David Evans" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hi Pravin,
>>
>>Thank you for helping out.
>>
>>As you saw below from ofproto/trace, the b0 bridge Datapath Actions says
>>it sends out gre packets with a header src .102 dest .101 destination
>>But the packet captured on the receiving host©ös ethernet port is as
>>follows (GRE header in tact from 2F) but the outer MAC & IP are 00...
>>
>>00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00
>>00 00 00 00 00 00 40 2F 46 9F C0 A8 38 66 C0 A8
>>38 65 00 00 65 58 00 00 04 04 12 34 00 00 04 56
>>78 90 08 00 45 00 01 EE 00 00 00 00 40 FF A6 B9
>>C0 A8 A8 05 C0 A8 A8 01
>>
>>Trying to trace this through:
>>
>>1) How did the Datapath Actions on b0 work out the src ip?
>>
>>
>>2) What is supposed to happen to the packet when it leaves the first
>>bridge b0?
>>How does it get to b1? I am guessing linux host routing?
>>
>>3) Could B1 be corrupting the header for some reason?
>>
>>4Š other possible factors ( netdev bridge? - DPDK ports?  linux stack arp
>>cache issue?)
>>
>>I can ping both directions between 102 & 101 across the wire. So that
>>connection is good.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>default_hugepagesz=2M hugepagesz=2M hugepages=2048
>>
>>On 2/11/15, 6:55 PM, "Pravin Shelar" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:52 PM, David Evans <[email protected]>
>>>wrote:
>>>> Hi OVS,
>>>>
>>>> I have 3.18 kernel containing ip_gre & Ovs 2.3.90 & Dpdk 1.7.1
>>>>
>>>Userspace tunneling does not need ip_gre module, tunneling is handled
>>>in userspace.
>>>
>>>> I find that the outer ip & mac are not populated ???  The ofproto/trace
>>>> output thinks that the gre output will have the right src/dest on the
>>>>outer
>>>> but then it©ös goneŠ
>>>>
>>>What do you mean by "its gone"? Can you post tcpdump for ping test?
>>>
>>>
>>>> a bug?
>>>> am I missing some setup?
>>>> Wrong kernel ip_gre?
>>>>
>>>> Originating GRE:
>>>> ovs-vsctl add-br b0  -- set bridge b0 datapath_type=netdev
>>>> ovs-vsctl add-port b0 gre0 -- set Interface gre0 type=gre
>>>> options:remote_ip=192.168.56.101
>>>> ovs-vsctl add-port b0 dpdk0 -- set Interface dpdk0 type=dpdk
>>>>
>>>> Output Bridge:
>>>> ovs-vsctl add-br b1  -- set bridge b1 datapath_type=netdev
>>>> ovs-vsctl add-port b1 dpdk1 -- set Interface dpdk1 type=dpdk
>>>> ifconfig b1 192.168.56.102 netmask 255.255.255.0
>>>>
>>>> Set up flows:
>>>> ovs-ofctl del-flows b0
>>>> ovs-ofctl del-flows b1
>>>> -force traffic to gre from dpdk0
>>>> ovs-ofctl add-flow b0 in_port=2,action=output:1
>>>> ovs-ofctl add-flow b0 in_port=1,action=output:0
>>>> -force traffic from b1 to output
>>>> ovs-ofctl add-flow b1 in_port=LOCAL,action=output:1
>>>> ovs-ofctl add-flow b1 in_port=1,action=output:LOCAL
>>>>
>>>> A ofproto/trace says
>>>>
>>>> ovs-appctl ofproto/trace b0 in_port=1,dl_dst=00:e0:ed:52:97:cd
>>>> Bridge: b0
>>>> Flow:
>>>>
>>>>in_port=1,vlan_tci=0x0000,dl_src=00:00:00:00:00:00,dl_dst=00:e0:ed:52:97
>>>>:
>>>>cd,dl_type=0x0000
>>>>
>>>> Rule: table=0 cookie=0 in_port=1
>>>> OpenFlow actions=output:2
>>>>
>>>> Final flow:
>>>>
>>>>in_port=1,vlan_tci=0x0000,dl_src=00:00:00:00:00:00,dl_dst=00:e0:ed:52:97
>>>>:
>>>>cd,dl_type=0x0000
>>>> Megaflow: recirc_id=0,in_port=1,dl_type=0x0000
>>>> Datapath actions:
>>>>
>>>>tnl_push(tnl_port(5),header(size=38,type=3,eth(dst=00:00:04:04:12:34,src
>>>>=
>>>>00:e0:ed:52:97:cb,dl_type=0x0800),ipv4(src=192.168.56.102,dst=192.168.56
>>>>.
>>>>101,proto=47,tos=0,ttl=64,frag=0x40),gre((flags=0x0,proto=0x6558))),out_
>>>>p
>>>>ort(2))
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> discuss mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to