tqchen commented on issue #265: URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm-ffi/issues/265#issuecomment-3573656587
I agree there can indeed be a tradeoff, in our particular case, i think the `ffi::Function` simplicity is an important constraint (because we need ABI to be simple and consistent to compiled and runtime use), and likely asking for all overloaded variant to appear in same place of registration is not too bad of an ask(to avoid intended behavior). It could still be possible to have a dynamic dispatcher where you need to have single dec site and register overloading for that, however, i am not sure if we want to immediately go that route. Perhaps starting with constraint version would be ok. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
