On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 05:04, Eric Blossom wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:26:57AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:40, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote: > > > > You'd need to buffer enough samples to get your delay. ie you don't care > > about time as such, just think of it in samples :) > > You'd be depending on unspecified and HIGHLY subject-to-change > implementation details. If you are counting on a delay and a parallel > filter to stay in phase, they need to be implemented in the same C++ > block. We don't make any guarantees about the amount of buffering > between blocks and whether it stays constant over time. > > Is this a scary enough disclaimer?
Ahh right, I didn't realise the buffering between blocks was allowed to change.. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
pgpcO40ZsnI1D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
