Quoting David Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I feel that gschem is getting mature enough to be useful but > PCB was a nightmare the time > I tried it.
PCB has come a long way in the last year. There is now even a GTK interface. > It looks like Matt uses geda for schematic capture but PADS? for > layout. Matt, can you comment > on this combination? I use geda for all schematics, and PCB for the boards that I lay out myself. For the more complicated boards I use a layout contactor who uses PADS. > It looks like the single-symbol parts have > footprint attributes but I don't see > the footprint on the multisymbol parts. How bad is symbol creation? It > looks like you're using tragesym. Yes, I use tragesym. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
