This will be extremely challenging. Synthetic Aperture Radar is much more complicated than say, pulsed-Doppler radar. Whereas, pulsed-Doppler radar can be explained in a few minutes, SAR cannot. In fact, the nuances of SAR take most people quite sometime to understand.
In addition to very strict radar transmitter and receiver requirements, you must have accurate aircraft positioning information to make the algorithms work (less than 1/8 of a wavelength in most cases). With that said, if you choose to continue with this project, I will be very interested to learn of your progress. - Lee On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 17:15 +0300, Mustafa Umut Sarac wrote: > Hello , > > I want to take mountain pictures without limitation of film , camera > or lens size and expense. > I want to know that how can I create the most basic sar receiver > transmitter combination for that purpose. > I found satellite receivers or ham radio gunnplexer based > transreceivers are cheap but I dont know they are for that purpose . > > Best regards , > > Mustafa Umut Sarac > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
