On 6/19/06 8:49 AM, "Michael Dickens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Back after a weekend trip w/o internet access ... > > On Jun 16, 2006, at 12:28 AM, David Lapsley wrote: >> I agree. This has been a really great discussion and has really >> helped to >> improve clarity and smooth some wrinkles in the document, but we >> should >> probably bring this phase to a close and start implementing. How >> about if >> I get this last set of comments into the document and then >> declare that the final version? > > Sounds good to me. Please check for typos too; there were a few. Great! Will do. I'm still working on it, but will have the "final" version out this week. > >> I will try to stick to the "less is more" >> philosophy as I am editing. > > Brevity is a virtue. Too much brevity leads to confusion and > "interpretation loss" ... sort of like channel capacity (via Shannon: > one can achieve maximum channel throughput [maximum brevity] with an > arbitrarily low data error rate, but any more brevity and there will > be errors [data loss]). - MLD I like the idea of applying Shannon's theorem to document editing. Very nice :-) Cheers, Dave. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
