On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 17:12 -0700, Matt Ettus wrote: > >doesn't it look like the USB 2.0 is a heavily constraining bottleneck? > > > > > Yes, USB2.0 is the bottleneck. > > >And, if I'm not wrong about this, will it be possible in the future to > >have a USRP <--> PC interface which doesn't limit us so much. > > > > > Other than 802.11, there aren't many applications that require more than > 8 MHz of bandwidth. Radio astronomy is one, but you can use fewer bits
For what it's worth, here's an simple 1st attempt to make a montage of 8MHz plots to show a wide band (240MHz of Galaxy 10R at 123W, Ku vertical): http://webpages.charter.net/cswiger/123w_3.jpg (1MB) The LNB lo is 10750M, so where it says "968" the actual f is 11718MHz, etc. Using DBSRX. --Chuck _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
