Dominik Auras wrote: > With the old blocks, there were these "kludge copy" blocks at the > input of an hierarchical block in the case that the input stream was > spreaded among several blocks in the inside. I saw this workaround in > your examples with a note that it will be obsolete when the new > blocks are implemented. > > This does not seem to work. I still need an input block as "kludge > copy". Actually, I do not know if you already completed the work on > the new blocks. So, is it a feature or a bug?
It's not clear from your post what isn't working. With the new style hierarchical blocks, you create a block and give it an io_signature indicating that it takes multiple inputs. >From inside the the block, you create your internal flowgraph with calls to self.connect() between your internally defined blocks. Then, you wire your externally visible inputs to the "real" inputs by calling self.connect(self, ...) for each input. The hierarchical block code is complete and in the trunk, with a number of examples using in the gnuradio-examples/python/hier/... directory. As we're inching toward a 3.1 release, we'll be porting all the remaining gnuradio-examples to the new flowgraph code. -- Johnathan Corgan Corgan Enterprises LLC http://corganenterprises.com _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
