Steven Clark wrote: > Do you have a sense of how much slower the regular atan2f function is > than gr_fast_atan2f?
I don't think there were any formal benchmarks done, but IIRC the fast atan2 reduced CPU utilization by a factor of 5 for a WFM demodulator. -- Johnathan Corgan Corgan Enterprises LLC http://corganenterprises.com _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
