Ive noticed that the papers you cited only take in "real" data and not "complex." Is this true? Is this true for your implementation?
Isaac Steven Clark-2 wrote: > > I've added a link to > http://gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/Enhanced_GMSK_Demodulator from > http://gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/OurUsers > > Summary: > [...] offers an enhanced GMSK demodulator that I believe to be > superior to the GNURadio standard gmsk demodulator. It should be a > drop-in replacement for the existing demodulator in designs, except > that the transmitted data needs to be differentially encoded (you will > NOT, however, need a differential decoder on the receive side). The > enhanced demodulator should offer better bit error rate (BER) > performance, especially for lower bandwidth-bittime (BT) products, > such as the GSM standard BT=0.3, and in lower SNR conditions. > > Please check it out and comment... > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Posted%3A-Enhanced-GMSK-demodulator-tp17677732p17691518.html Sent from the GnuRadio mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
