Eric Blossom wrote:
The pmt type probably needs to be reimplemented. The current version was coded in about 1 day. It was the simplest thing that could have possibly worked. I'm disinclined to go with statically typed messages for a number of reasons that I don't have time to go into now. Think about lisp, scheme, python, ruby, erlang... marshalling self-describing data across a network connection...
Just a little bit from just about the only person who has *actually* used the PMT type other than Eric ;) I definitely agree with Eric against statically typed messages. It will severely impact a major goal of the PMT, which is to support dynamic messages between blocks for MAC implementations. :)
- George _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
