On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Newell Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the USRP2 why did you guys decide to go with the Microblaze soft > processor (which is not open source) versus the OpenRISC core on > OpenCores.org (which is open source)? Was it just the overhead that would > have been needed to get it up and running (my guess) or was it something > else? Actually, USRP2 uses the AEMB from OpenCores: http://www.opencores.org/projects.cgi/web/aemb/overview -- Johnathan Corgan Corgan Enterprises LLC http://corganenterprises.com/ _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
