________________________________

From: Johnathan Corgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bill Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 2:57:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] a report on dqpsk modulation in gnuradio


Thank you, Johnathan! I did my experimentation again with different 
configuration. Below are the arguments I used for my experimentation:

-r 400k -s 1500: 50% of the transmitted packets are received, but 0 right. The 
received packet number increased continuously.

-r 400k -s 500: 66% of the transmitted packets are received, but 0 right. The 
received packet number increased continuously.

-r 400k -s 300: 71% of the transmitted packets are received, but 0 right. The 
received packet number increased continuously.

-r 400k -s 200: 93.6% of the transmitted packets are received, but 0 right. The 
received packet number increased irregularly.

One USRP is controlled by my laptop (Compaq Presario C700, 1.46GHz Dual-Core 
Pentium, 1GB RAM), which is used for Tx and another USRP is handled by a 
desktop (Gateway, 2.40GHz, Core 2 Dual, 2GB RAM), which is used for Rx. The two 
USRP are 3m apart from each other. The reason why we used 2Mbps for dqpsk 
case was that when the bit rate is up to 2Mbps, the PER ratio could somehow 
reach its 'minimum value', and there is no uO sign on my desktop PC, but there 
was one or two uU signs on my laptop part when s is set to 100. I really cannot 
figure out why I cannot get dqpsk scheme done when you have successfully 
verified it works fine in your configuration. I am totally confused, is there 
anything wrong with my setup described above, Johnathan? I really need 
guidance. Thank you!!!

Bill 




On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Bill Stevenson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> python benchmark_tx.py -f 2479M -r 2000k -m dqpsk -s 100 (-s 800 or -s 1500)
> python benchmark_rx.py -f 2479M -r 2000k -m dqpsk

What is the CPU type and speed you are using?  In my experience, data
rates above about 500 kbps are difficult to receive on a typical
laptop platform due to lack of sufficient CPU cycles.  On an Intel
Core2 Duo at 2.1 GHz (IBM Thinkpad T60), I can't go above 800 kbps.
Your rate of 2 Mbps is likely much too high. Are you seeing any "uO"
on your output?

-Johnathan


      
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to