well i have sorted out the issue. I was doing a mistake by putting 'cd' before
the directory and then was trying to run the file after entering the directory
(gnuradio/usrp/host/apps). I should have written the following in terminal
instead:
go...@ubuntu:~gnuradio/usrp/host/apps/burn-db-eeprom -t rfx900_mimo_a -f -A -B
This works fine.
Gohar
gohar wrote:
I did all the modifications on rfx900.
when trying to burn eeprom i receive the following error.
bash: burn-db-eeprom: command not found
I am trying to run the command in the following manner (after mounting the
rfx900 on side A of USRP rev 3):
go...@ubuntu:~/gnuradio/usrp/host/apps$burn-db-eeprom -t rfx900_mimo_a -f -A -B
What am i missing?
Is there any problem with the permissions? If yes, then how to set permissions
correctly?
Gohar
The newer way will have better phase noise.
Matt
Newell Jensen wrote:
> When doing this modification, is there any performance differences
> between using a setup with this modification versus a newer USRP1 that
> doesn't need this modification? I think I had heard that the newer
> USRP1 has better clock performance or something for the RFX900 boards
> and didn't know how much a setup with this modification would perform
> in comparison to a setup with a newer USRP1 (using the RFX900 boards).
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Matt Ettus
> > wrote:
>
> Gohar wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Is it possible to use rfx900 with usrp rev 3 hardware that was
> released in 2005? If yes, what changigs should be made on
> either board (usrp board or rfx900 board) ?
>
>
>
>
> On the RFX board
> Move R36 to R34
> Move R115 to R116
>
> Put the rfx board on the USRP and run
>
> burn-db-eeprom -t rfx900_mimo_a -f -A -B
>
> Matt
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio