Hi all, If I have .cc .h .i and Makefile.am all ready, could I go back to the top directory containing "configure" and make again(make from the top) instead of using automake at src/lib directory in order to generate the make file?
Thank you, Milo On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Douglas Geiger < [email protected]> wrote: > I believe you need to re-generate it manually (I'm not sure if the > intent was to have it automagically re-built or not). If you go into > the directory(s) that contain the .i files, you can call: > make generate-makefile-swig > And the Makefile.swig.gen's will be rebuilt from the top-level > template (Makefile.swig.gen.t) according to the names you've set in > the Makefile.am. Removing it entirely does seem to make the > automake/autoconf system choke. > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Jordan J Riggs<[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> You don't need to modify that file; it's [Makefile.swig.gen] generated. > > > > Are you sure about this? When I replace every occurrence of "howto" in > > Makefile.swig.gen with my own package name, it seems to work. However, > when > > I leave this file as it is in gr-how-to-write-a-block, or remove it > > entirely, the build process fails. (At make or in bootstrap, > respectively.) > > After looking closely at that file, it looks like it should be generated, > > but my experiences say otherwise. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > > > > > > > > -- > Doug Geiger > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
