On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Jeffrey Lambert <[email protected]> wrote: > Running an FFT is a CPU intensive application, and not a bandwidth/IO > restricted application. The comparison made here is likely not an accurate > representation of throughput if only data stream to disk is the goal. > > ~Jeff
FFT's are actually pretty cheap to calculate (profile it; they usually aren't a huge consumer of resources unless you're running very large FFTs). Tom >> I run Gnu Radio on an Atom D510 system for narrow-bandwidth radiometry. >> >> No way in heck are you going to be able to run at 25Msps for even a >> *single* USRP2, let alone multiple ones. >> I tried a 25Msps usrp2_fft.py on my atom D510 system (which is >> dual-core at 1.6GHz), and it couldn't keep >> up. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
