I was using that many so I could see how it all worked better (plots with two samples per symbol are a little less intuitive to look at). I realize it's not of practical importance but I thought it was interesting.
Cheers, Ben On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Tom Rondeau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Ben Reynwar <[email protected]> wrote: >> When I run >> gnuradio/gnuradio-examples/python/digital/benchmark_qt_loopback2.py >> I get a strange dependence on samples_per_symbol. >> >> I would naively have expected that the more samples per symbol the >> better, however: >> >> python benchmark_qt_loopback2.py --samples_per_symbol 10 >> produces no errors >> >> whereas >> python benchmark_qt_loopback2.py --samples_per_symbol 11 >> produces lots of errors >> >> Does anyone have any idea what's going on here? >> >> Cheers, >> Ben > > That's a very large number of samples per symbol. I know I tested up > to 10, but more than that's pretty excessive. Ok, more than 2 is > excessive, really. Off the top of my head, I can't think of exactly > what might be going wrong here, but you should really never need to > use that many samples per symbol, anyway. > > Tom > _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
