My bad. I misread the git revision log on the web site: http://code.ettus.com/redmine/ettus/projects/uhd/repository/revisions Somehow the frame size checkin showed up under "master".
I will try out the reverse diff. Thanks, Michael On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Josh Blum <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2. The latest UHD repository master (4/27) seems to have a serious > > regression for E100. I get data samples coming in but expected signal is > > not there (or corrupted in serious way). As I replied to you in another > > thread, I saw this happen also with the "usrp_e100_frame_size2" branch > you > > posted for me on 4/26 and merged to the master today. In any case, my > > I did not merge that into the master yet? > > > E100-friendly UHD git version is from 4/19, so it looks like the > regression > > happened at some point between then and now. > > > > None of that changed in a serious way. But since you mentioned RFX, it > might be this change which involved moving the R divider of the RFX onto > the clock distribution: 1304340f269b6474a49970ee302e08ca9ed8d0ed > > I cant test it now, but can you can try this reverse diff of the > changeset and see if that works? > > http://code.ettus.com/redmine/ettus/projects/uhd/repository/revisions/905a681afd3b8d089a3dbfe7aa31bbcb5a020c05/diff?format=diff&rev_to=1304340f269b6474a49970ee302e08ca9ed8d0ed > > -Josh >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
