On 01/13/2012 11:01 AM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> Observe the following directory listing:
> 
> [mleech@localhost ~]$ ls -l /usr/local/lib/libgnuradio-core*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      34 2012-01-13 13:56
> /usr/local/lib/libgnuradio-core-3.5.2git.so.0 ->
> libgnuradio-core-3.5.2git.so.0.0.0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      34 2012-01-13 13:56
> /usr/local/lib/libgnuradio-core.so -> libgnuradio-core-3.5.2git.so.0.0.0
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2108365 2012-01-13 13:45
> /usr/local/lib/libgnuradio-core.so.0.0.0
> 
> Notice how libgnuradio-core.so  points off to nothingness
> 
> Now, gnuradio-based *applications* seem to be just fine with this, after
> running ldconfig.
> 
> But, for example, if you pull something, like gr-stream-tags off of
> CGRAN, and try to build the result, it
>   will barf on a linker error, due to not being able to resolve
> "-lgnuradio-core" (and others).
> 
> So the question is, where is cmake getting its notion of how to name
> these things, and set up the
>   symlink hierarchy?  If it comes from the ".pc" files, I'll note that
> they haven't been updated since
>   I last ran an autotools build, 5 days ago.  Does cmake update the
> ".pc" files?  How is this
>   dangling symlink problem happening?
> 
> 

The weirdness comes from this code:
http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/tree/cmake/Modules/GrMiscUtils.cmake?h=maint#n151

The symlinks looks like this on my system:
http://pastebin.com/Q4Vuz8Kb

What is your os? I think this line for you isnt changing the library
target name to ${target}-${LIBVER}. Does that sound like the issue?

set_target_properties(${target} PROPERTIES LIBRARY_OUTPUT_NAME
${target}-${LIBVER} SOVERSION "0.0.0")

-Josh


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to