On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 08:03:52PM -0500, Tom Rondeau wrote: > Thinking of the results as one large matrix item probably isn't going to work. > As you said, there's a system limitation at play here. What if, instead, you > passed the data along as though it were a stream of floats (or complex > floats). > Along side that, the block that creates the matrix sends a "start of matrix" > and "end of matrix" tag, so the blocks down the line know what to look for and > can reassemble the matrix from there. > > > I'm assuming that all of your blocks in the chain that deal with the data as a > matrix are home-brewed and not current blocks, so you would only need to add > the tag-handling capabilities to your blocks.
Hi Tom, thanks for the suggestion. We've been doing it similarly, only without the tags--following blocks simply knew what was coming and pieced it together accordingly. The tags might actually be a nicer solution, much more flexible. Cheers MB -- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Communications Engineering Lab (CEL) Dipl.-Ing. Martin Braun Research Associate Kaiserstraße 12 Building 05.01 76131 Karlsruhe Phone: +49 721 608-43790 Fax: +49 721 608-46071 www.cel.kit.edu KIT -- University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
