Let me put it this way... I'm going to build it because I need it ;)  But
what I'm asking/hoping for is for it to be useful beyond just me and
actually have a lifespan beyond my immediate use of it.  So, I'd like to
get some feedback on how others might like to see it tied in to UHD, or the
type of flexibility the implementation should have.  For example, the
programmability of the threshold, the type of back off, the control of the
back off, etc.

You don't get these types of people on the list very often because they
simply look at GNU Radio and USRPs architecture and go: well, it doesn't
support that... moving right along to another platform (e.g., WARP, Sora,
etc.).  But speaking from my area (wireless networking, not so much
wireless communications), it is this kind of functionality that a lot of
people want/need to build a network on top of the OFDM code, for example.

You can say that energy sensing isn't general enough or any implementation
of it wouldn't be general enough, but IMO staying away from it more
significantly limits possible applications of the platform rather than
expanding it.  I think this type of functionality can further support a new
set of applications and networks.  I don't feel as though it threatens the
flexibility of GNU Radio because it's not fundamentally changing the
architecture. It's exploiting the tight-control that UHD was put in place
to try and enable. It's functionality that sleeps in the FPGA unless you
need it to build your application.

Like I said, I can build it as a separate FPGA firmware for those who want
to use the functionality (though I fear it gets deprecated quite quickly in
that way)... but it would be good to hear what kind of functionality and
flexibility people would like to see in a carrier sense implementation, how
it could be controlled, etc.  Otherwise, I will go off and "do my thang"
and you simply get what comes out of it ;)
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to