On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Alexandru Csete <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Josh Blum <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey list, > > > > Nick Foster and I have done a lot of work to simplify and generalize the > > VOLK build system. > > > > * Removed old autotools related generalization > > * Fixes for stand-alone building of VOLK > > * AVX enabled detection support on MSVC > > * Building and generation now share common code > > * The architecture specifications: > > ** feature availability checks are fully specified > > ** required compiler flags listed with compiler association > > * Generated c/h files have corresponding templates > > ** generator code is drastically more readable/editable > > > > The branch is here: > > https://github.com/guruofquality/gnuradio/tree/volk_work > > > > I would appreciate anyone testing the branch, especially on weird > machines: > > * does it build? > > * do the unit tests pass? > > * does volk detect correctly? > > > > My opteron says: > > $volk/lib/test_all > > Running 88 test cases... > > Using Volk machine: sse4_a_64_orc > > Hi Josh, > > I checked out your code few hours ago and tested it on two machines, > both running 32 bit linux. > Compiles fine on both but the same test fails, see attached files. > #$%^& This is entirely inexplicable. We've seen both the Orc and SSE versions fail (identically, differing from the generic result) on processors from both Intel and AMD. http://gnuradio.org/redmine/issues/468 Josh, I'm going to implement the FPU environment settings stuff and see if that helps. Shouldn't be hard, it's something we've been meaning to do anyway. > > Alex > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
