On 10/12/2012 02:06 PM, Rick Graham wrote: > Is this a cause for concern?
Nah, just a slight rounding issue. And in one of the blocks that doesnt even need predictable output :-) I will take a look... -josh > > [from "ctest -V"] > Start 4: qa_noise_source > > 4: Test command: /bin/sh > "/usr/local/src/build-gnuradio/grextras/build/python/qa_noise_source_test.sh" > 4: Test timeout computed to be: 9.99988e+06 > 4: linux; GNU C++ version 4.6.3 20120306 (Red Hat 4.6.3-2); > Boost_104700; UHD_003.004.003-255-gc7054ce5 > 4: > 4: F > 4: ====================================================================== > 4: FAIL: test_001 (__main__.test_noise_source) > 4: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > 4: Traceback (most recent call last): > 4: File "/usr/local/src/build-gnuradio/grextras/python/qa_noise_source.py", > line 55, in test_001 > 4: self.assertEqual (expected_result, dst_data) > 4: AssertionError: Tuples differ: (-6.88858699798584, 26.1499595... != > (-6.88858699798584, 26.1499595... > 4: > 4: First differing element 10: > 4: 1.21760773659 > 4: 1.21761083603 > 4: > 4: (-6.88858699798584, > 4: 26.149959564208984, > 4: 20.575775146484375, > 4: -7.934014320373535, > 4: 5.335927486419678, > 4: -12.552099227905273, > 4: 6.333674430847168, > 4: -23.830753326416016, > 4: -16.603046417236328, > 4: 2.9676761627197266, > 4: - 1.2176077365875244, > 4: + 1.2176108360290527, > 4: 15.100193977355957) > 4: > 4: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > 4: Ran 1 test in 0.008s > 4: > 4: FAILED (failures=1) > 4/9 Test #4: qa_noise_source ..................***Failed 0.35 sec > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
