Hi Tom,

Thanks for the reply.. I teed the output at the Rx to a file. It showed O's
on my screen, but the file had no O's. I came to know from a friend of mine
that the O's may be going into the stderr and the file had only stdout
output. But the errors you see there were actually preceded by O's. I will
run them again after making the changes you suggested.

Thank you


On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Tom Rondeau <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Manu T S <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was running the benchmark scripts with the following set of parametrs
>>
>> -f 915M -r 5000000 -m psk -8
>>
>> with 30 dB gain set on both Tx and Rx. I was getting cluttered overflows
>> and packet received during that time are in error.. Like I'm receiving
>> about a 1000 packet without error and then then system runs into overflow
>> and about then quite a large number of packets are received in error.
>>
>> Output is posted
>>
>> Demodulator:
>> bits per symbol:     3
>> RRC roll-off factor: 0.35
>> FLL bandwidth:       6.28e-02
>> Timing bandwidth:    6.28e-02
>> Phase bandwidth:     6.28e-02
>> -- Opening a USRP2/N-Series device...
>> -- Current recv frame size: 1472 bytes
>> -- Current send frame size: 1472 bytes
>>
>> UHD Receiver:
>> UHD Args:
>> Freq:        915MHz
>> Gain:        30.000000 dB
>> Sample Rate: 3.33333Msps
>> Antenna:     None
>> Spec:        None
>>
>> Demodulator:
>> bits per symbol:     3
>> RRC roll-off factor: 0.35
>> FLL bandwidth:       6.28e-02
>> Timing bandwidth:    6.28e-02
>> Phase bandwidth:     6.28e-02
>>
>> Receive Path:
>> modulation:      psk_demod
>> bitrate:         5Mb/s
>> samples/symbol:  2.0000
>> Differential:    True
>> Using Volk machine: avx_64_mmx
>> ok =  True  pktno =    1  n_rcvd =    1  n_right =    1
>> ok =  True  pktno =    2  n_rcvd =    2  n_right =    2
>> ok =  True  pktno =    3  n_rcvd =    3  n_right =    3
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> ok =  True  pktno = 2953  n_rcvd = 2953  n_right = 2953
>> ok =  True  pktno = 2954  n_rcvd = 2954  n_right = 2954
>> ok =  True  pktno = 2955  n_rcvd = 2955  n_right = 2955
>> ok =  True  pktno = 2956  n_rcvd = 2956  n_right = 2956
>> ok = False  pktno = 2957  n_rcvd = 2957  n_right = 2956
>> ok = False  pktno = 2959  n_rcvd = 2958  n_right = 2956
>> ok = False  pktno = 2961  n_rcvd = 2959  n_right = 2956
>> ok = False  pktno = 2963  n_rcvd = 2960  n_right = 2956
>> ok = False  pktno = 2965  n_rcvd = 2961  n_right = 2956
>> ok = False  pktno = 2967  n_rcvd = 2962  n_right = 2956
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> ok = False  pktno = 3838  n_rcvd = 3369  n_right = 2956
>> ok = False  pktno = 3841  n_rcvd = 3370  n_right = 2956
>> ok = False  pktno = 3843  n_rcvd = 3371  n_right = 2956
>> ok =  True  pktno = 3845  n_rcvd = 3372  n_right = 2957
>> ok =  True  pktno = 3846  n_rcvd = 3373  n_right = 2958
>> ok =  True  pktno = 3847  n_rcvd = 3374  n_right = 2959
>> ok =  True  pktno = 3848  n_rcvd = 3375  n_right = 2960
>> .
>> .
>> .
>>
>>
>> Any idea how to avoid these overflows???
>> --
>> Manu T S
>>
>
> This is usually a problem due to the receiver not being able to keep up
> with the flow of samples from the UHD device. Try running at a lower
> bitrate. If you're seeing overflows temporarily and then things are
> correcting themselves, it looks like you might be right on the edge of your
> system's capabilities. In this case, it's like some other process/task is
> taking some time away from your app, causing it to slow down just enough to
> cause problems, but then things look like they come back. You could also
> try to run with realtime privileges enabled to make sure your process gets
> priority.
>
> On the other hand, the output you show here doesn't have any overflow
> indication. Are you sure that this is what's happening? You're running at
> 915 MHz, the center of the 900 MHz ISM band (depending on where you are).
> It's likely to have other signals in it. Maybe this is just a case of
> interference?
>
> Tom
>
>


-- 
Manu T S
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to