Hi Nikita,

In order to answer your question we need more information on what you want
to do exactly. gr-fosphor takes all unprocessed samples and does everything
on the GPU. Calculating spectrum, graphical output etc. As far as I know
there isn't a way to get the samples back from the GPU.

Cheers
Johannes


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Nikita Sharakhov <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Johannes,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the answer!  I am building my own web-based GUI, so I just need
> a script that just writes the spectrum data to a text file or to standard
> command-line output.  Is that possible with gr-fosphor?  Is there any other
> software that I should look at?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Nikita
>
>
>
> *From:* Johannes Demel [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, December 16, 2013 10:58 PM
> *To:* Nikita Sharakhov
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Spectrum Sensing
>
>
>
> Hi Nikita,
>
> 'uhd_fft' is only a graphical frontend for your flowgraph. It contains a
> WX FFT Sink and some information about your setup. The WX FFT Sink itself
> seems to be so fast because it only calculates about 10 FFTs per second.
> All the other input samples are simply dropped. If you want to have a real
> real-time GUI take a look at gr-fosphor.
>
> If a few snapshots of the spectrum per second are sufficient for you,
> think about a keeping only a tiny fraction of your input samples. This will
> speed things up. On the other hand, if you want to calculate a FFT for all
> samples, look at the FFT block. BTW: the output of the FFT block would be
> the 'raw samples' you were asking for.
>
> Happy hacking
>
> Johannes
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Nikita Sharakhov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I would like to do spectrum sensing with GNU radio. Is there a good way to
> get the raw output from uhd_fft.py (the value for each frequency)? I would
> like to do this programatically (with code), rather than through a GUI.
>
> I have tried doing spectrum sensing with usrp_spectrum_sense.py, and this
> script has questionable accuracy and seems to be much slower than
> uhd_fft.py.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to